I'm often, given my role, the mouthpiece for silverorange. We've been criticized before for being Borg like in our mindsets and our thinking. Mots of the time it's true. When it comes to the Immigrant Investment program we weren't that perfect unified group.
As I mentioned before:
... silverorange, or any of our associated corporations (we have a few), have never received immigrant investment. We qualify, and we've had very serious debate about using the program, but we have never received any cash nor have we even applied. I'll make a post on this in the future as it's a whole story in an of itself.
This is a true statement but "very serious debate" is a little bit of an understatement.
When this program came to our attention I, like any dutiful CEO, brought it to the company to evaluate. Our company qualified under the rules of the program, it was fairly straight forward, and many people I know in the business community were legitimately using the program. It seemed like it could be a good fit for us. We had some expansion and upgrades we wanted to do and who doesn't like a little padding on the balance sheet?
When I brought it to the rest of the group all of us, myself included, except for one were in favour of proceeding to the next level of discussing it with lawyers, accounts, brokers, etc. The issue of debate was the morality of the program itself. Is it right for a country to allow this path of immigration? We brought in journalists, other participants in the program, and whomever else we could find to discuss the issue. It literally paralysed us for a solid three weeks.
In the end, after all of the research and debate, we still could not reach a unanimous decision. The founding principles of silverorange prevailed and we allowed one person to veto the group. As a result we did not pursue the investment.
So if it had been up to me I would more-than-likely have taken the money. I'm ok with that. I would not have tried to squeeze our real-estate company through the loopholes, I would not have created more companies out of thin air to qualify. I simply would have used the program as it was intended to be used.
It may seem from my recent posts that I'm against the program all together. I'm not. Heck, my father participated in it. The debate about the morality/existence of the program is completely separate from the abuse of it.
Do I regret the one person veto? Do I wish we had gotten the cash? Not at all. The integrity and long term health of a team is worth far, far more than whatever they were offering us.


